The best running shoes for asphalt and trail running

The design and look of athletic shoes for running has undergone major changes over the past few years. The usual minimalism and neutrality of forms have sunk into oblivion and have given way to more dynamic and free styles. As a result, due to all these changes, the current product market is packed to capacity with a variety of running shoes, with each manufacturer claiming that their running shoes are better, cheaper, and more practical.

To save you from the agonizing search for the right shoes for daily runs. We offer for your consideration a rating that includes the best running shoes designed for running, on asphalt, treadmills and visiting fitness clubs. The opinions of the Internet portal "Run Repeat" were taken into account, where the choice is made by the users themselves and professional athletes.

TOP 10: Rating of the best running shoes according to user and athlete reviews

1st place: "Adistar Boost ESM"

The Boost ESM by Adidas is a reliable and comfortable shoe with maximum cushioning, which was most praised by users. The design and quality of materials provide increased wear resistance and comfort during training. They make it easier to support the foot in the middle of the foot, which most buyers really liked.

✅ What users rated:

• Flexible upper for extra comfort while running
• Comfortable toe shape helps to get a firmer hold on the back of the shoe when weight is transferred to it;
• The use of "mid-sole boost" technology helps the runner to use less energy and provides good support;
• Many buyers first of all praised the cushioning system of the sneaker.
• Great for asphalt and trail running

• Relatively high price;
• There have been complaints of increased stiffness in the midsole;
• Some reviewers were confused by the thickness of the sole: in their opinion, it is not thick enough.

2nd place: "Adidas Supernova Glide Boost 8"

The manufacturer literally stuffed Supernova Glide Boost 8 with its best developments and technologies from top to bottom. These are really high quality and reliable running shoes that are recommended by many professional runners to people who are planning to get into running training seriously.

✅ What users rated:

• Convenience and comfort;
• Good support for the entire foot;
• The texture of the sole allows you to take smooth and wide steps;
• The inner surface did not rub the leg even during very long workouts;
• The roomy forefoot allows the toes to move naturally.

❌ What alerted them and did not like:

• The shoe width is not for everyone.

3rd place: "Adidas Ultra Boost Uncaged"

"Adidas Ultra Boost Uncaged" was rated by most of the respondents in two words: comfort and safety. Like all models of Adidas sports shoes, the cushioning system of the sneakers was also highly appreciated. Unfortunately, due to their high cost, they are only in third place.

✅ What users rated:

• Attractive appearance;
• When changing shoes to this brand, many appreciated their light weight: they became less tired;
• Wear resistance and strength;
• The inner surface fits snugly to the feet, it seems like a second skin.

❌ What alerted them and did not like:

• Price, price and again price;
• Some buyers have complained that the shoe rubs the top of the foot near the laces.

“It's interesting to know. Adidas earns only $2 on each pair of its sneakers. Approximately 40% of the remaining price is the cost of production, insurance, transportation costs: the remaining 53-55% of the price is the markup of the end seller.”

4th place: "Asics Gel Fortitude 7"

The Gel Fortitude series has made its way into the hearts of runners who don't like tall shoes that restrict movement. Due to the good grip of the outsole with the ground and low weight, the shoes are suitable for both professional athletes who are accustomed to long and hard workouts, and novice runners.

✅ What users rated:

• Low streamlined shoes;
• Light weight;
• Comfort while wearing;
• High flexibility sole and upper;
• High grip outsole.

❌ What alerted them and did not like:

• Not detected.

5th place: "Adidas Tracerocker"

During a survey of buyers by Adidas specialists about the quality of Adidas Tracerocker, in 90% of cases only positive feedback was received. At the same time, it was indicated that the sneakers were suitable for running along the paths of the park and for training on a treadmill. The dissatisfied were embarrassed by the thickness of the midsole, but when asked directly about the degree of wear after six months of use, they most often answered that nothing had happened to the shoes.

✅ What users rated:

• Design and appearance;
• Convenience of wearing;
• A light weight;
• The durability of the materials used;

❌ What alerted them and did not like:

• Some testers said that after a month of wearing the shoes began to creak and make annoying sounds;
• Not wide enough
• Some people didn't like the cushioning.

6th place: "Nike Flyknit Racer"

The Nike Flyknit Racer has been able to keep many runners comfortable and safe. Also, buyers are delighted with the style of the shoes. A number of professional athletes have stated that this is the shoe they use for regular runs. However, some testers noted the fact that the material of the upper is not strong enough and wears out very quickly.

✅ What users rated:

• Attractive color and design;
• Sneakers tightly and comfortably wrap around the entire foot, so it seems that the second sock was put on, and not the shoe;
• The material on top is breathable, so the feet do not sweat and stay dry while running;
• Elasticity when repulsed from the ground;
• Light weight.

❌ What alerted them and did not like:

• The appearance of scuffs and even holes after several months of use;
• The narrow central part will not suit people with a wide foot.

7th place: "Asics Gel Noosa Tri 11"

This series of running shoes continues to be popular among casual runners. The Gel Noosa Tri 11 has received an updated topcoat design, stronger material and fabric texture. They also became even lighter, which was positively evaluated by many fans of this brand of sports shoes.

✅ What users rated:

• The upper part is made of strong fabric with good breathability;
• Minimum weight and ease of wear;
• The designers made the shoes seamless;
• The use of elastic laces was to the liking of the laziest and those who do not want to spend time fussing with strings;
• Durability of sole and fabric.

❌ What alerted them and did not like:

• The narrow front part rubbed the toes;
• Appearance: it reminded many of the tasteless and ugly plastic.

8th place: "Brooks Glycerin 13"

The flagship model from Brooks is really ultra-soft and comfortable. Comfort is the main feature of these shoes. In addition, they have an excellent cushioning system. The combination of these qualities makes shoes from Brooks ideal for lovers of long, daily runs on asphalt, parks and treadmills.

✅ What users rated:

• Ultra comfort;
• Noiselessness;
• Light weight;
• Excellent flexibility;
• orthopedic effect.

❌ What alerted them and did not like:

• Some disliked the flat shape of the shoe;
• The size parameters are underestimated: many had to buy shoes one size larger;
• Bad ventilation.

9th place: "Mizuno Wave Rider 20"

Runners commented that the Mizuno Wave Rider 20 was a worthy continuation of the popular road running shoe series. In their opinion, the new model was able to surpass its predecessors by an order of magnitude. Such good reviews were received due to the successful design of all parts of the sole. On the other hand, there were also dissatisfied buyers: problems with the size and width of the sneakers were recorded.

✅ What users rated:

• Outsole design;
• Minimum weight;
• Universal shoes: for running, gym and extreme recreation;
• The fabric is breathable: the foot stays cool and does not sweat;
• Withstand heavy load and weight.

❌ What alerted them and did not like:

• In a short period of time, some users had the upper part torn or even fell off;
• Not enough cushioning for long runs.

10th place: "On Cloudflow"

The "On Cloudflow" model received favorable reviews from fans due to its design and convenience. A number of buyers liked the shoe's light weight, thoughtful cushioning system, and well-ventilated upper. There were practically no complaints about the shoes.

✅ What users rated:

• Even prolonged wear does not cause discomfort;
• Lightweight with good cushioning
• Quality of workmanship and wear resistance of materials;
• Versatility: for the gym, park and training on asphalt and trail running.

❌ What alerted them and did not like:

• Small pebbles and dirt often get stuck in the sole;
• Glide on wet surfaces.

What should you keep in mind when buying running shoes?

Since all the above models of rating in terms of comfort and efficiency have almost identical parameters, only the price remains an important factor. Remember that in well-known branded stores you always overpay a significant amount of money, so the best place to buy will be online portals where you can buy the same model much cheaper. Another way to save money is to make a purchase out of season: then you can buy shoes even with a 50% discount.